Skip to content
Our data

Two in three sources AI cites are company websites

You hear it everywhere. To show up in ChatGPT, get yourself on Reddit. We looked at 20,879 real answers from ten engines and forums account for under 3% of the citations.

·8 min read·Our data

When somebody asks an AI about a product category, the model leans on a specific handful of sources to write its answer. Knowing which ones changes where the effort is worth spending.

We went through everything ten engines cited over almost three months. Here are the numbers.

What we measured

Every answer Bee LLM collected between 2 June and 22 August 2026, across all accounts:

Answers analysed20,879
Engines10 (ChatGPT web and API, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Qwen)
Scope14 projects across 7 sectors, from hospitality to software
Links logged56,966 cited and 214,038 opened

Two things get mixed up constantly, so it is worth pulling them apart:

The AI reads ten pages and shows you fewer than three

On average each answer opens 10.3 pages and links only 2.7. It reads almost four times as much as it shows.

There is a second figure that gets far less attention. Only 51.5% of answers cite anything at all. The other half answers without a single link. In those cases a brand can be recommended and still not earn one visit.

Being cited and being recommended are not the same thing. You can have one without the other, and they are worth measuring separately.

Two in three citations are company websites

This is how the 56,966 citations split by type of site. We stripped out the websites of the brands we track and their competitors, so self-citation does not inflate the figure:

Type of sourceShare of citations
Company website66.0%
Media and publishers11.2%
Marketplaces5.9%
Directories4.4%
Forums2.7%
Reference sites (Wikipedia and similar)2.5%
Social networks2.4%
Institutions2.1%
Review sites1.9%

Forums, the source everyone talks about, come fifth and stay under 3%. Reddit on its own picks up 1,060 citations, which sounds like plenty until you set it against a total of nearly 57,000.

What dominates is far more boring and far easier to control: company pages explaining what they do. Product pages, comparisons, use cases, documentation.

Every engine decides differently

Averaging ten engines into one number hides some wide gaps. These are the three figures that separate them best:

EnginePages openedSources citedAnswers with a citation
Perplexity12.75.8100%
ChatGPT (web)16.84.496%
Google AI Mode12.83.865%
Gemini5.53.742%
Claude6.93.575%
ChatGPT (API)36.43.376%
Copilot4.22.346%
AI Overviews1.31.342%
DeepSeek0.00.00%
Qwen0.20.00%

Three things fall out of that table:

The ChatGPT API stands out on its own terms. It opens 36 pages on average and links three. It reads an enormous amount and shows very little.

The sources that turn up in the most projects

A domain with hundreds of citations inside a single project is a local quirk. What tells you something about the wider ecosystem is the domains that appear across different projects. These showed up in the most:

DomainTypeProjects it appears in
elpais.comMedia9
reddit.comForum8
youtube.comSocial8
google.comCompany7
es.wikipedia.orgReference6
cincodias.elpais.comMedia5
tripadvisor.esReviews5
booking.comMarketplace4
trustpilot.comReviews4

Reddit and YouTube really are everywhere. Both turn up in 8 of the 14 projects. What they do not have is weight inside each answer. Wide reach, small share.

Mainstream press performs better than its reputation suggests. El País appears in nine different projects, more than any other source in the set.

What to do with this

Four practical conclusions, in order of effort:

  1. Your own site is still the main piece. Two in three citations go to company pages. Explaining clearly what you do, who it is for and how it differs still carries most of the weight.
  2. Forums are not the shortcut they look like. They supply under 3% of the citations. Useful, but not where the match is won.
  3. Press and directories punch above their size. Media, directories and review sites add up to 17.5% between them, and they are places you can work on deliberately rather than hope for.
  4. Pick the engine to match the goal. If you want visits, Perplexity and ChatGPT web cite generously. If you want to be named, DeepSeek and Qwen depend entirely on what the model already knows about you.

In one line

  • 66% of what AI cites are company websites. Forums stay under 3%.
  • It opens 10.3 pages on average and links only 2.7. Half of all answers cite nothing.
  • Perplexity cites in 100% of its answers. AI Overviews in 42%.

One caveat about these numbers. They come from 14 projects across 7 sectors, mostly software, hospitality and professional services in Spain. Treat them as a bearing, not a universal law. Measure your own case, because the split shifts a good deal from one sector to the next.

See which sources AI cites about your brand

Bee LLM checks daily which websites ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews link when they talk about your category, and which ones they only read. From €19.90/month, or start free with no card.

Start free

Read next: the sources the AI reads but never cites · why track the URLs AI cites · AI cites deep pages, visitors land on the homepage.